People overestimate legal protections for dogs, study finds
Most people in the U.K. don't fully understand dog laws in the country and often believe stronger protections exist than actually exist, according to a new University of Stirling study. The research, led by psychologist Sarah Weir of the University's Faculty of Natural Sciences and involving more than 1,700 people across the U.K., explored how changing attitudes toward dogs are shaping public expectations and knowledge of dog law.
The study, published in Animals, showed that participants often overestimated the level of legal protection provided for dogs. The study also found that dog owners were consistently more confident than non-owners when answering questions about the law—but not more accurate.
Weir explained, "These findings challenge common assumptions about legal awareness and responsible ownership, showing that while dog owners are often expected to understand and comply with the law, they are no more accurate in their knowledge than non-owners.
"This raises concerns about how legal understanding can be improved when people are unaware their knowledge is inaccurate."
Researchers carried out a nationally representative survey of 1,758 adults across the U.K. to assess knowledge of 22 current, nation-specific and hypothetical dog laws. Responses were analyzed using multinomial statistical models—a method that compares different response categories (such as correct, incorrect or unsure)—to identify patterns across demographic groups.
It found that while most respondents were familiar with high-profile measures such as dog waste rules and banned breeds, significant misconceptions remained. Notably, 85% believed that aversive training methods were already banned, while only 16% correctly understood that no legislation explicitly prohibits the euthanasia of healthy dogs.
More than half of respondents were also unaware that strict bans on shock collars apply only in Wales, not in other parts of the U.K., while less than half of those taking part were aware of nationwide laws making it illegal for a dog to cause fear or apprehension in another person in a private home.
Weir added, "The research also suggested that differences in legal knowledge may be linked to broader social change. Younger participants were more likely to assume that stronger legal protections for dogs and owners already existed, which may reflect the increasingly elevated status of dogs in society.
"Many people increasingly view their dogs as more like family members or children than was historically the case.
"In some cases, people who had never owned a dog were also more likely to assume that laws providing greater protection for dogs, particularly those that placed additional responsibilities on owners, already existed.
"This suggests that expectations about dog welfare and regulation are not limited to dog owners but may instead reflect wider societal views about how dogs should be treated. If future generations continue to view dogs differently, public expectations of dog law may continue to change."
Publication details
Sarah A. Weir et al, Exploring Public Knowledge of Dog Law in the UK: Evidence of Poor Legal Knowledge in a Nationally Representative Sample, Animals (2026). DOI: 10.3390/ani16101463
Who's behind this story?
BA art history, MA material culture. Former museum editor, paramedic, and transplant coordinator. Editing for Science X since 2021. Full profile →
Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X's editorial success. Full profile →
Citation: People overestimate legal protections for dogs, study finds (2026, July 15) retrieved 16 July 2026 from https://phys.org/news/2026-07-people-overestimate-legal-dogs.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.